Constable critters and UFOs.

It should not be too difficult to accept that there could be large, as yet unidentified, creatures living in our oceans, deserted areas of the earth, but the idea that enormous primitive life-forms may be populating our aerial oceans (that we call our skies) may not be so easily  believed.

How can something be invisible yet nevertheless physical?  We know that there are sounds we cannot hear and only became aware of microbes with the advent of the microscope. It should not be too difficult to conceive, therefore, of a material world which is invisible to us.

All living organisms have field radiation emanating from them.  The development of radar, which was developed primarily for long-range detection of enemy aircraft, to feel electronically for objects that could not be seen with the eyes, led to the detection of other things.  These things were not aircraft and proved to be invisible even when within visual range, (Nansei-shoto, U S Navy, WW 2 is one case).  It seems that having devised an instrument to locate invisible airborne objects man was not prepared to find or accept other than what he was specifically seeking.  Radar designers did not anticipate that their device would detect objects that were completely invisible, objects which are nevertheless physical.

But these days there is plenty of photographic proof of these invisible protozoa, coming from all around the world, myself included, in the form of videos, cameras etc.  There can be no doubt that the skies around us are filled with living beings which seem to have intelligence and be sensitive to radar and radio waves.  When they stray into our frequency band these organisms could be mistakenly responsible for UFO sightings throughout the ages.

Trevor Constable first wrote about what he termed `critters`, that live within the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum.  He advanced the theory that UFOs were mainly invisible and that our atmosphere was the home of huge, invisible living creatures, plasmatic bioforms, and that these were naturally confused with spacecraft when they became visible.  What he had discovered was something new and amazing about this world which could create a biological revolution but the reaction to his findings was a deafening silence and fifty years later the cosmos is still waiting for a response.

Speaking not as an academic but just an ordinary housewife, I cannot help wondering why biological UFOs have been so shamefully dismissed by the scientific establishment and, in general, all branches of the media.

I and others like me are not seeking the approval of scientists who may be qualified in their own fields, because there are NO authorities in this particular work.  But we are looking for those who are calm, objective and with open minds who do not turn irrational and terrified when confronted with photographic evidence of biological aeroforms who exist for the most part invisibly in the ether all around us.

These bioforms may be an elemental branch of evolution, dating from the time when the planet was more gaseous and plasmatic than solid.  When eventually they are recognized by science they may be classified as belonging to the general field of macrobiology or macrobacteria.